+ [found] +
8 notes
Wow –- Frank Chimero’s recent articles are just killing it.
It’s that sort of thing that happens when you read a great writer or thinker and you feel like you are actually being taught a new language, a useful way of organizing thoughts and impressions you already own in some messy, unstructured form.
For example, you may feel you’ve been looking at the color red, starting to notice it, to begin to recognize it’s qualities and instances, to differentiate it from non-red; but then this person comes along and says, “by the way, that’s called ‘Red’.” Then all of the sudden these hazy, half-formed (but deeply felt) impressions become clear and you gain the ability (that comes with all language and categorization) to manipulate the concept abstractly, to apply metaphor, make new connections, and deploy the concept as a new and useful tool in your own life or work or play.
Anyway, Mr. Chimero is writing some really great stuff. For instance:
Pseudo-Structures
There is no secret to creativity besides possessing a habitual work ethic. But sometimes, it’s just hard as hell. Here we are, fortunate enough to possess hands that can harness magic to turn nothing in to something. We have ears pointed towards the muses. But the only voice I’m hearing is Alan Alda’s, and I’m waiting to see what kind of hijinx he and Honeycutt have gotten themselves in to on this MASH rerun.
Motivation has a reputation for being elusive. (I’ve looked hard, but it’s nowhere in this MASH episode.) Sometimes, if you’re lucky, it will come to you. A voice breaks into song. Pacing turns to dance. An image appears. A story surfaces and begs to be told. The kettle whistles with kinetic energy and a creative act is fostered in to being. You’ve done well and you get to keep your gift for another day.
It’s magical when a song or story writes itself. But, it’s also a rarity to have motivation invite itself over and come to your doorstep with a muse. Typically motivation comes alone, and doesn’t know what to do with itself. Creative energy without an outlet is wasted. Motivation doesn’t disappear. It evaporates.
Creatives have to be quick to put their motivation to task. One strategy is to use what I call a “pseudo-structure.” A pseudo-structure is a rule, limitation, or theme used to get the creativity flowing. They’re frameworks for creative activity and improvisation. Limitations are the playground of a creative mind, and these rules are a way to get to work. They are a latticework on which to hang ideas.
Many of the greats used pseudo-structures. Vivaldi wrote four violin concertos: one for each season. Shakespeare’s sonnets follow a specific rhyming scheme and are always 14 lines. During Picasso’s blue period, he essentially only painted monochromatically. There’s many more.
The restrictions in a pseudo-structure can take many shapes. They can be conceptual, where the restrictions determine the subject matter of the work. (Write a song for each one of the muses. Create an illustration for each letter of the alphabet. Write a short story inspired by each member of the Jackson 5.) They can also be structural, where compositional restrictions are created. (Paint on surfaces that are 3 inches wide and 24 inches tall. Write a 14-line sonnet. Choreograph a dance, where the dancer doesn’t step outside a 6×6’ square) Or instrumental, where the tools are deliberately crippled. (Paint monochromatically. Write without pronouns. Write a song on a mistuned guitar.)
Once some restrictions are set, it’s best to consider the qualities of the pseudo-structure and how they can leveraged. For instance, if I were painting monochromatically in blue, I could choose to only paint things that were really blue, or sad scenes, or even places bathed in bluish, cavernous light. Or, if I really wanted to push it, I could paint the Blue Man Group in front of a blue screen giving a weather forecast. Sometimes, a simple pseudo-structure can provide unpredictable results.
No matter what pseudo-structure one chooses for themselves, it should be restrictive enough to help them get going, but open enough to not dictate what path they take. Remember: these rules only exist to get things started. Feel free to break them during the process if it would benefit the final result. Pseudo-structures aren’t a necessity for creative work. They’re a tool that can be used to overcome the gap between finding the desire to work and knowing where to put your efforts.
Creativity is about action and life is about movement. The creative spirit is about transforming nothing in to something and seeing how we can get ourselves in to hijinx of our own. And those are the best sort. Sorry, Honeycutt.
+ [found] +
36 notes
This is for Ronen. For two reasons. First he creates the best GIF’s I’ve ever seen. Or at least I have the most fun viewing his GIF’s. Secondly I always see this tag when I leave my place here in Jerusalem and everytime I see it now I somehow think of Ronen (fully aware he is not going to be a rav anymore but that he once studied at Yeshiva here. :)…) I’ve never met Ronen, but this was first GIF I’ve ever created and it is in his honor.
Ha! Love it, Chris :)
+ [found] +
14 notes
Faking It
yes please. make it. really make it.
“How do you get those uneven edges in your illustrations?”
“I draw them, unevenly.”“What’s the best way to get this to look like it’s cut out of paper?”
“Cut it out of paper.”“What typeface are you using? It looks so much like handwriting.”
“That’s my handwriting.”These are all real questions I’ve been asked by folks. At lectures, in class, over email. It makes me feel like I’m in the business of serving up plain, glaring answers.
“Care to shed some enlightenment, Frank?”
“Hm, I don’t know. How about a big pile of obvious?”Sorry folks, the most evident way of doing something is typically the way that I do it. No secret labs, no special tools, no computer gee-whizzery.
Disappointing, isn’t it? I’m not surprised that these people are asking these questions. I think everyone wants a peek into someone else’s process. What surprises me is that they infer there isn’t an easy, obvious answer to their questions. There’s a digital silver bullet somewhere, and damned if they aren’t going to find it. But still, surely people still know that handwriting something and scanning it in is an option, rather than using a typeface?
What’s interesting to me is that these questions are being raised because some peoples’ default states are to “fake it.” Maybe that’s a natural response to being constantly presented with things that are not real. Maybe it’s from working with tools whose reach is so wide, it’s sometimes difficult to grasp where their edges truly lie. The issue is that faking it is turning an awful lot of creative processes that have the potential to be deep oceans into shallow puddles. It’s weakening our physical connection to our work.
Our audiences have lower standards too. It’s unusual for them to be confronted with authenticity. When confronted with it, they’re startled. They don’t want to believe, and their first response is generally to scream “fake!” But, no green screen. No movie special effects. No camera tricks. Nothing that’s kind of like this other thing but isn’t quite it. It is what it is. And it really happened. I hadn’t fully realized it until recently, but authenticity is special now. Authenticity is special now.
“Wait, are you telling me they really released all of these bouncy balls down this big hill?” Yes I am. And if you have the choice, I think you should do it that way too.
+ [found] +
120 notes
reblogged for Jared:
This is clearly the greatest movie review ever written. The blockquote below doesn’t even do it justice.
You know who I love? I love anyone who hated this movie because I would like to fight them to the death for being wrong as balls. Fuckouttahere. I wanna be on the 2012 thrill park ride, playing 2012 on my Nintendo DS, eating the 2012-branded chocotaco and watching this movie at the same time because I am greedy for this brand of INCREDIBLEBANANASINCREDIBLE. Everyone who says otherwise may as well have written their reviews on their faces in marker because they are obviously batshit crazy and should be ignored. Seriously, will somebody tell me what people expected other than 158 minutes of apocalypse BUKKAKE?
+ [found] +
12 notes
+ [found] +
28 notes
The Warden. Made my new favorite piece of art.
warden:scratchboard brooklyn bridge I did awhile ago
+ [found] +
16 notes
Balthazar Ginger Citrus Iced Tea (minus the ice). Making its way up to 64th & York in a cab. When we reach our destination, the ice shall be added.
It’s sort of a lot of work for a drink. But it’s the kind of drink that makes it worth it.
I don’t like ginger or iced tea, but something tells me I should try this drink.







